Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
How much sway case regulation holds could change by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances of your current case. To explore this concept, look at the following case law definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the discovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
The official court record is maintained because of the court of record. Copies of case file documents aren't readily available around the search site and will need to get ordered from the court of record.
However it is made very clear that police is free to just take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also make certain regard with the family drop in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as a issue of security from the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of here filing this petition has become reached. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated over. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.
Many judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based about the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more
Case law, also used interchangeably with common legislation, is usually a law that is based on precedents, that may be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.